Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48911 - 48920 of 63807 for judgment for ms.
Search results 48911 - 48920 of 63807 for judgment for ms.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to one count of kidnapping as a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821130 - 2024-07-03
appeals a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to one count of kidnapping as a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821130 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, by counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
, by counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, by counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
, by counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707889 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Blake Allen Smith appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Blake Allen Smith appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Luster Goodman, Jr.
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DENNIS P. MORONEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DENNIS P. MORONEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10553 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sweet’s arguments, and we summarily affirm the judgment. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532632 - 2022-06-14
Sweet’s arguments, and we summarily affirm the judgment. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532632 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reversing the judgment of conviction. We conclude that any further appellate proceedings would be wholly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175379 - 2017-09-21
for reversing the judgment of conviction. We conclude that any further appellate proceedings would be wholly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Clark County: FREDERIC FLEISHAUER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83377 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Clark County: FREDERIC FLEISHAUER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83377 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187497 - 2017-09-21
. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187497 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
found no other arguable basis for reversing the judgment of conviction. We conclude that any further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102346 - 2017-09-21
found no other arguable basis for reversing the judgment of conviction. We conclude that any further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102346 - 2017-09-21