Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48911 - 48920 of 74849 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Richard L. Harris
argument reported, that a juror was biased against him, and that the incomplete trial court record has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12491 - 2017-09-21

Shirley A. Gemas v. Susan R. Meyer
the inference drawn by the jury. See id. The Gemases contend that there is no credible evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12150 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joyce A. Neumann
a discretionary decision “we will independently review the record to determine whether it provides a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12099 - 2005-03-31

Barron County v. Brian T.
it makes an order that it knows is impossible to comply with under the facts in the record. Brian counters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4619 - 2005-03-31

James P. Troia v. Carrie A. Troia
of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Long, 196 Wis.2d at 695, 539 N.W.2d at 464. Child Support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13083 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the judgment and the order because there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101751 - 2013-09-10

State v. Richard L. Harris
him, and that the incomplete trial court record has deprived him of a meaningful appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12490 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
of the habitual criminality penalty enhancers. After reviewing the record, this court disagrees with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09

Sauk County Department of Human Services v. Jody L. C.-P.
of the County were not “conscientious” efforts because there is nothing in the record showing that the social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7083 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
criminality penalty enhancers. After reviewing the record, this court disagrees with his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21