Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48941 - 48950 of 83359 for simple case search.
Search results 48941 - 48950 of 83359 for simple case search.
State v. Bryan S. Campbell
; (7) certain testimony violated Campbell’s plea agreement in a previous case; (8) the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
; (7) certain testimony violated Campbell’s plea agreement in a previous case; (8) the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
through the full colloquy required by the cases, and certainly made no attempt to give [him] an awareness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
through the full colloquy required by the cases, and certainly made no attempt to give [him] an awareness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
Oak Hill Development Corporation v. Board of Review for the City of Oak Creek
. Additionally, interpreting the Manual in this case to exclude the use of the Development Method valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12671 - 2005-03-31
. Additionally, interpreting the Manual in this case to exclude the use of the Development Method valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case on the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Stephen S.
rights. Stephen did, and his TPR case was tried before a jury. The jury unanimously found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
rights. Stephen did, and his TPR case was tried before a jury. The jury unanimously found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
State v. John D. Meindl
)(c) in effect at the time of the offense, which provided: In cases involving persons who have 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
)(c) in effect at the time of the offense, which provided: In cases involving persons who have 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
these amended pleadings were improper because the summary judgment had completely disposed of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88158 - 2014-09-15
these amended pleadings were improper because the summary judgment had completely disposed of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88158 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
[:] 2 pages of complaint case # 11CV188 stapled together—but not attached to either of the other 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87238 - 2013-12-26
[:] 2 pages of complaint case # 11CV188 stapled together—but not attached to either of the other 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87238 - 2013-12-26