Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48941 - 48950 of 83962 for simple case search.
Search results 48941 - 48950 of 83962 for simple case search.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Virginia Rose Ray
2004 WI 45 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-1743-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16795 - 2011-07-12
2004 WI 45 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-1743-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16795 - 2011-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782690 - 2024-04-02
a review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782690 - 2024-04-02
State v. George A. King
at the hearing. The motion for an adjournment was denied again and the case was tried on November 2, 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
at the hearing. The motion for an adjournment was denied again and the case was tried on November 2, 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Heather Olmsted v. Circuit Court for Dane County
2000 WI App 261 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-0620
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2345 - 2017-09-19
2000 WI App 261 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-0620
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2345 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not testify at trial. To prove its case, the State relied instead on testimony from one of the officers who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176615 - 2017-09-21
not testify at trial. To prove its case, the State relied instead on testimony from one of the officers who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lillie M. Jones v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
of this case. We agree. Because the County’s duty was discretionary, we conclude that the County is immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4206 - 2017-09-19
of this case. We agree. Because the County’s duty was discretionary, we conclude that the County is immune
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4206 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Willie Nunn
affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves the death of Dorothy Roberts, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19093 - 2017-09-21
affirm the judgment and order. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves the death of Dorothy Roberts, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tee & Bee, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0602 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13691 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0602 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13691 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the present case. The court determined, however, that Wakefield could permissibly testify regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
in the present case. The court determined, however, that Wakefield could permissibly testify regarding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie K.
not expired under this section if there is good cause for not hearing the cases separately. (h) Any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25597 - 2017-09-21
not expired under this section if there is good cause for not hearing the cases separately. (h) Any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25597 - 2017-09-21