Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48961 - 48970 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48961 - 48970 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mary Kathleen Arthur
2004 WI 66 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-3448-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI 66 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-3448-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not aware that the State was going to use the recordings in its case-in-chief, and the No. 2008AP2109
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43011 - 2014-09-15
was not aware that the State was going to use the recordings in its case-in-chief, and the No. 2008AP2109
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43011 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jacquelyn J. Dingeldein
.” WIS. STAT. § 943.201(1). Specifically relevant to this case, an individual’s name and social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
.” WIS. STAT. § 943.201(1). Specifically relevant to this case, an individual’s name and social
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21632 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and then proceed pro se.” The case was passed so that counsel could confer further with Griffin. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2011-03-28
and then proceed pro se.” The case was passed so that counsel could confer further with Griffin. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61922 - 2011-03-28
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James F. Blask
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1233-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17252 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1233-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Lipscomb
and the case was tried to a jury. During the trial, Harris’s girlfriend, Jacklyn Isabell, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18837 - 2017-09-21
and the case was tried to a jury. During the trial, Harris’s girlfriend, Jacklyn Isabell, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brenda K. Pierstorff
). 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 97-1093-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12354 - 2017-09-21
). 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 97-1093-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12354 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals. ¶9 Lukanich argues “the primary issue to be decided by the court in this case is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
appeals. ¶9 Lukanich argues “the primary issue to be decided by the court in this case is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case was winding down and that Whitelaw had made a speedy trial claim, insisting that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454732 - 2021-11-23
case was winding down and that Whitelaw had made a speedy trial claim, insisting that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454732 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178974 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178974 - 2017-09-21