Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48961 - 48970 of 83389 for simple case search.

[PDF] NOTICE
in this case by pleading no contest to a non-criminal ordinance violation for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32519 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
revocation hearing in a different case and (2) his attorney failed to show him a particular witness statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89384 - 2012-11-20

WI App 10 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP392 Complete Title of ...
2013 WI App 10 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP392 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90366 - 2014-02-25

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
The case was tried to a jury in September 1996, and Harris was found guilty on both counts. Terrance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28566 - 2007-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not contain allegations that the missing documents “were absolutely necessary to make [Dronso’s] case[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037577 - 2025-11-18

2009 WI APP 91
2009 WI App 91 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP2138-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36492 - 2009-06-29

COURT OF APPEALS
[:] 2 pages of complaint case # 11CV188 stapled together—but not attached to either of the other 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87238 - 2012-09-17

COURT OF APPEALS
to police. Hazel provided police a statement on June 11, 2009. ¶6 Before trial in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106333 - 2014-01-06

COURT OF APPEALS
and in particular the problematic process undertaken in this particular case.” The prosecution objected because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2011-10-13

State v. Joe J. Davis
was not prejudiced by counsel’s failure to raise the issue. We therefore affirm. ¶2 This case has a rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31