Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48971 - 48980 of 64778 for b's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Rusk v. Eugene A. Ringhand
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5. AppealNo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6959 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Nathan Dulin
will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS. OpinionCaseNumber 2017-09-19T22:49:02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11097 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
)(b)5. [1] State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797, 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). [2] In a related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106737 - 2014-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49006 - 2010-04-20

State v. Mark J. Zimmerman
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6158 - 2005-03-31

State v. Londell Dallas
Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8731 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31273 - 2007-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] Rodebaugh petitioned this court for leave to appeal the non-final order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80353 - 2012-04-04

State v. Scott A. Teasdale
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16005 - 2005-03-31