Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48991 - 49000 of 61553 for judgment.
Search results 48991 - 49000 of 61553 for judgment.
Susan C. Lulling-Porter v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
to void the judgment. The trial court granted the Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9156 - 2005-03-31
to void the judgment. The trial court granted the Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288796 - 2020-09-17
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288796 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053123 - 2025-12-23
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053123 - 2025-12-23
State v. Edward L. Hennings
a direct appeal in 1997. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction, including the sentence and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20544 - 2005-12-12
a direct appeal in 1997. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction, including the sentence and denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20544 - 2005-12-12
[MS WORD]
PR-1850: Petition for Special Administration (Formal Administration)
or is of importance to the petitioner or any other person. |_| B. the final judgment of distribution
/formdisplay/PR-1850.doc?formNumber=PR-1850&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-25
or is of importance to the petitioner or any other person. |_| B. the final judgment of distribution
/formdisplay/PR-1850.doc?formNumber=PR-1850&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209551 - 2018-03-06
discloses no other potential issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209551 - 2018-03-06
Betty Jane Maher v. Peggy Jeanne Maher and Patricia Marie Majewski
of the summary judgment motion, Thomas was already planning at the time the trust was executed to subdivide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5395 - 2005-03-31
of the summary judgment motion, Thomas was already planning at the time the trust was executed to subdivide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Iran Shuttlesworth
) appeals from a court of appeals' decision, affirming both his judgment of conviction on two counts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17565 - 2017-09-21
) appeals from a court of appeals' decision, affirming both his judgment of conviction on two counts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 3 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456079 - 2021-11-24
-CRNM 3 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456079 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasons. First, the court entered a default judgment against Kamal based on Kamal’s failure to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170458 - 2017-09-21
reasons. First, the court entered a default judgment against Kamal based on Kamal’s failure to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170458 - 2017-09-21