Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 4440 for neg.

State v. Douglas S. Zunker
. The prosecutor was free to focus on negative information about Zunker to support the ten-year recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3602 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Brandt to take a second test and that result was negative. Brandt was permitted to continue his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78454 - 2014-09-15

State v. Reginald R. Carter
that was based on a misstatement of the law and dwelling on the potential negative consequences of testifying. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24868 - 2006-04-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 11, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
a month would cause a “substantial negative impact on the lifestyle of the child,” and taking into count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98052 - 2013-06-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would experience negative collateral consequences from the existence of the order. See D.K., 390 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=464129 - 2021-12-20

[PDF] State v. Reginald R. Carter
that was based on a misstatement of the law and dwelling on the potential negative consequences of testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24868 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was negative. Brandt was permitted to continue his employment. In September 2009 he was tested again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78454 - 2012-03-13

[PDF] Keric T. Dechant v. Monarch Life Insurance Company
to draw a persuasive and negative inference against a party who fails to call a witness who would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7707 - 2017-09-19

Keric T. Dechant v. Monarch Life Insurance Company
a persuasive and negative inference against a party who fails to call a witness who would otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7707 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would cause a “substantial negative impact on the lifestyle of the child,” and taking into count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98052 - 2014-09-15