Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 90364 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 491 - 500 of 90364 for police arresting judge 2 part.
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
at the time of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe that the defendant probably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
at the time of the arrest would lead a reasonable police officer to believe that the defendant probably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peggy A. Hampton
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 99-0662-CR 2 inside her residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 99-0662-CR 2 inside her residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15243 - 2017-09-21
State v. Molli A. Huling
of arrest, Hodges knew that: (1) Huling’s car hit a tree in a one-vehicle accident; (2) she smelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2303 - 2005-03-31
of arrest, Hodges knew that: (1) Huling’s car hit a tree in a one-vehicle accident; (2) she smelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2303 - 2005-03-31
State v. Debra J. Findlay
. 17, 2000), we affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Findlay was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2841 - 2005-03-31
. 17, 2000), we affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Findlay was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2841 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
a two-part inquiry: (1) was the person moved within the vicinity; and (2) was the purpose in moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15008 - 2005-03-31
a two-part inquiry: (1) was the person moved within the vicinity; and (2) was the purpose in moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15008 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
a two-part inquiry: (1) was the person moved within the vicinity; and (2) was the purpose in moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15009 - 2005-03-31
a two-part inquiry: (1) was the person moved within the vicinity; and (2) was the purpose in moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Kain
of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: RICHARD J. NUSS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6579 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: RICHARD J. NUSS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6579 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Columbia County: W. ANDREW VOIGT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192011 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of the circuit court for Columbia County: W. ANDREW VOIGT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192011 - 2017-09-21
City of Kenosha v. Timothy M. Clark
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: ROBERT V. BAKER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9435 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County: ROBERT V. BAKER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Troy D. Moore
that police used Pearson “in purchasing cocaine from two individuals which we ended up arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4124 - 2017-09-20
that police used Pearson “in purchasing cocaine from two individuals which we ended up arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4124 - 2017-09-20