Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 56136 for so.
Search results 491 - 500 of 56136 for so.
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy Clark
or that he did so for the purpose of sexual gratification. Because the State presented sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5259 - 2017-09-19
or that he did so for the purpose of sexual gratification. Because the State presented sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5259 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeremy Clark
that he intentionally touched a female guard’s groin through her clothing or that he did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5259 - 2005-03-31
that he intentionally touched a female guard’s groin through her clothing or that he did so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5259 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it could not rely. Brettkreutz has not filed a reply brief disputing this argument, so we consider his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29369 - 2007-06-13
it could not rely. Brettkreutz has not filed a reply brief disputing this argument, so we consider his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29369 - 2007-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial testimony obtained through prosecutorial misconduct so tainted his trial as to deprive him of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
prejudicial testimony obtained through prosecutorial misconduct so tainted his trial as to deprive him of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
properly exercised its discretion in imposing the sentence. If so, we then consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
properly exercised its discretion in imposing the sentence. If so, we then consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bradley G. Genrich
and that the failure to do so violated his due process right to present a defense. We conclude that the evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24519 - 2006-03-21
and that the failure to do so violated his due process right to present a defense. We conclude that the evidence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24519 - 2006-03-21
State v. Charlotte Kotlov
was then thirty-two, she was “so afraid that it was going to happen again.” Kotlov, not her former stepfather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11545 - 2005-03-31
was then thirty-two, she was “so afraid that it was going to happen again.” Kotlov, not her former stepfather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11545 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that it is a manifest injustice that the monetary judgment against Jeffrey is not “joint and several” with Janet so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102517 - 2013-10-16
that it is a manifest injustice that the monetary judgment against Jeffrey is not “joint and several” with Janet so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102517 - 2013-10-16
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
. If so, we then consider whether that discretion was erroneously exercised due to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9011 - 2005-03-31
. If so, we then consider whether that discretion was erroneously exercised due to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9011 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. April O.
upon a showing of good cause and only for so long as is necessary. The issue is whether the court lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31
upon a showing of good cause and only for so long as is necessary. The issue is whether the court lost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3418 - 2005-03-31