Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 96383 for state case.
Search results 491 - 500 of 96383 for state case.
State v. Christopher Townsend
. Nos. 00-0174-CR 00-0175-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2168 - 2005-03-31
. Nos. 00-0174-CR 00-0175-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harrison Franklin
809.62, STATS. No. 97-0858-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12262 - 2017-09-21
809.62, STATS. No. 97-0858-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Juan Mata
with the trial. Following a midday recess, the case continued with opening statements. After the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21
with the trial. Following a midday recess, the case continued with opening statements. After the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12854 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Watkins
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 04-2377-CR Cir. Ct. No. 03CM002612 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 04-2377-CR Cir. Ct. No. 03CM002612 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
State v. Johnnie Phiffer
to the prosecutor from other sources—was the appropriate one in this case. Alternatively, the State argues Phiffer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
to the prosecutor from other sources—was the appropriate one in this case. Alternatively, the State argues Phiffer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14410 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carlos Santiago
, if, as in this case, the accused in a timely fashion puts the State on notice of the claim that he or she
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16912 - 2005-03-31
, if, as in this case, the accused in a timely fashion puts the State on notice of the claim that he or she
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16912 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Heinrich
, 901 (Ct. App. 1995). In the present case, the State argues that “this court should not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12655 - 2017-09-21
, 901 (Ct. App. 1995). In the present case, the State argues that “this court should not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason Phillips
), and, as in this case, on the defendant’s voluntary consent. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17065 - 2017-09-21
), and, as in this case, on the defendant’s voluntary consent. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17065 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anou Lo
to implement Escalona. His mission was to bury the case. ¶54 This court determined in State v. Knight, 168
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16491 - 2005-03-31
to implement Escalona. His mission was to bury the case. ¶54 This court determined in State v. Knight, 168
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16491 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnell Sartin
expression by this court of the knowledge requirement in a drug possession case. In Poellinger, we stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16891 - 2005-03-31
expression by this court of the knowledge requirement in a drug possession case. In Poellinger, we stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16891 - 2005-03-31