Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 556 for widths.
Search results 491 - 500 of 556 for widths.
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decision in case no. 2009AP191
the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68484 - 2014-09-15
the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decisions in case nos. 2009AP1579 and 2010AP1142
the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68678 - 2014-09-15
the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
July 19, 2011
-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68294 - 2014-09-15
-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68294 - 2014-09-15
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
of Racine by a corridor that varied in width from 152 feet to 306 feet. 24 Wis. 2d at 43, 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5708 - 2005-03-31
of Racine by a corridor that varied in width from 152 feet to 306 feet. 24 Wis. 2d at 43, 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5708 - 2005-03-31
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
of Racine by a corridor that varied in width from 152 feet to 306 feet. 24 Wis. 2d at 43, 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5688 - 2005-03-31
of Racine by a corridor that varied in width from 152 feet to 306 feet. 24 Wis. 2d at 43, 47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5688 - 2005-03-31
AKG Real Estate, LLC v. Patrick J. Kosterman
feet wide. By increasing the width of the easement, Louis and Angeline made it possible
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25925 - 2006-07-13
feet wide. By increasing the width of the easement, Louis and Angeline made it possible
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25925 - 2006-07-13
Frontsheet
and shall be 40 feet in width. It is undisputed that the legal description in the easement describes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52414 - 2010-07-19
and shall be 40 feet in width. It is undisputed that the legal description in the easement describes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52414 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
WI APP 39
, ¶30 (stating that when the deed granted “an easement 20 feet in width” on riparian land, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
, ¶30 (stating that when the deed granted “an easement 20 feet in width” on riparian land, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
[PDF]
WI 93
West to Erin Road and shall be 40 feet in width. 4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52414 - 2014-09-15
West to Erin Road and shall be 40 feet in width. 4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
AKG Real Estate, LLC v. Patrick J. Kosterman
course as the 1960 easement. This second easement was 66 feet wide. By increasing the width
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25925 - 2017-09-21
course as the 1960 easement. This second easement was 66 feet wide. By increasing the width
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25925 - 2017-09-21