Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4901 - 4910 of 6989 for a u.

Nancy Thiede v. Terry Neuman
. App. 1996), this court noted that “[u]nder the unambiguous language of § 767.25(6), Stats., a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12825 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 22
. Blaesser & Christine M. Kentopp, Impact Fees: The “Second Generation,” 38 WASH. U. J. URB. & CONTEMP. L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511962 - 2022-06-08

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
. This is what the family court said: [U]p to the filing of the petition the Ricks attempted to communicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45600 - 2010-02-23

State v. Ibrahim Begicevic
and drove past the scene, made a U-turn, activated her emergency lights and came up behind the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6454 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the PSI report states that, “[u]nprompted[,] [Barth] began the interview with [the PSI] writer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Village of Slinger, 2018 WI 45, ¶30, 381 Wis. 2d 311, 912 N.W.2d 56. “[U]pon consideration of any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806882 - 2024-05-29

State v. Samuel Arthur Brown
of his Alford pleas, the prosecutor stated that “[u]pon a plea of guilty to the offense …, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16039 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] that it did not apply in [her] case.” She averred and testified that Steinhafel “str[u]ng her along” until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145272 - 2015-07-28

[PDF] John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
my ‘without pay’ suspension days.” ¶25 “[U]niformity and consistency” in the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14599 - 2017-09-21

Barron County v. Janet S.
termination of parental rights. There is a requirement that a GAL in a CHIPS action, [u]nless granted leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2625 - 2005-03-31