Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49021 - 49030 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
than a tactic to deal with legitimate issues involved in the defense of the case. ¶8 Given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115773 - 2014-07-01

County of Racine v. Ronald C.
chapters.” Thiel, 2001 WI App 32 at ¶18. In fact, a ch. 980 case is less like a ch. 51 proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3770 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alex S.
is allowed in cases involving child victims. See Fawcett, 145 Wis.2d at 254, 426 N.W.2d at 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13789 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a friend from school came in with two cases. The friend asked Ellefsen to keep the cases. Ellefsen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32223 - 2008-03-25

State v. Crystal Glynn
showed utter disregard for human life. The court there simply considered whether the facts of that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12149 - 2005-03-31

County of Winnebago v. Gary A. Burns
in this case includes the incident report of Kluck.[2] When reviewing an order on a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4648 - 2013-10-16

T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
or determination in question. Id. ¶9 Construing an ordinance under the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31

Donald R. Stringer v. Joyce D. Stringer
arrangement in each case. LaRocque, 139 Wis.2d at 32-33, 406 N.W.2d at 740. Donald specifically contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9263 - 2005-03-31

WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP935-CR Complete Title ...
2013 WI App 37 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP935-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92374 - 2013-03-26

Larry J. Bauer v. Merlin R. Carothers
thing we tried this case over was the shoulder injury.” Bauer’s counsel clarified: “Not shoulder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4803 - 2005-03-31