Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49031 - 49040 of 56213 for n y c.

State v. Nicholas D. Kasten
v. Luk, 154 Wis. 2d 282, 291 n.5, 453 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1990); see also Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7583 - 2005-03-31

Robin W. Hancock v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
they did not invoke that statute in the trial court. Majority slip op. at 3 n.1. I, however, agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9451 - 2005-03-31

Cementation Company of America v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
interlocutory order provided: [N]o evidence was submitted by [Sebree] ¼ suggesting permanent partial disability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9949 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
n.7, 292 Wis. 2d 212, 713 N.W.2d 661; Gibson v. Overnite Transp. Co., 2003 WI App 210, ¶9, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36297 - 2009-04-29

Carl E. Merow v. Joseph J. Kox
) damages. See Cook v. Continental Cas. Co., 180 Wis.2d 237, 245 n.2, 509 N.W.2d 100, 103 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10990 - 2005-03-31

Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
between the parties were administrative, not judicial. See id. at 313 n.2, 418 N.W.2d at 38. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14014 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
809.19(1)(d); see also Roy v. St. Lukes Med. Ctr., 2007 WI App 218, ¶10 n.1, 305 Wis. 2d 658, 741 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917441 - 2025-02-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 295 Wis. 2d 556, 721 N.W.2d 704; see also Milton v. Washburn County, 2011 WI App 48, ¶8 n.5, 332 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970828 - 2025-06-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
its discretion. See Ford, 306 Wis. 2d 1, ¶29. “[N]ot all errors warrant a mistrial[.]” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099355 - 2026-04-02

[PDF] State v. Michael Marks
detainer statute is statutory in nature. See Davis, 248 Wis. 2d 986, ¶3 n.2 (noting that dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20