Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49041 - 49050 of 59232 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 49041 - 49050 of 59232 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Martial Ledvina v. Scott Puksich
for eviction against his tenants, Scott and Angie Puksich, claiming that they had failed to pay rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7376 - 2005-03-31
for eviction against his tenants, Scott and Angie Puksich, claiming that they had failed to pay rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7376 - 2005-03-31
June Table of Unpublished Opinions
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43 - 2004-07-13
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43 - 2004-07-13
[PDF]
Suzanne Marie Johnson v. Norman T. Johnson
payment to his former wife, Suzanne, from $14,236.04 to $41,323.00. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
payment to his former wife, Suzanne, from $14,236.04 to $41,323.00. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter James Nickitas
(1).2 Attorney Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21691 - 2017-09-21
(1).2 Attorney Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21691 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alexander Stocks
, Stocks claims that the State failed to properly prove the prior conviction. This court disagrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31
, Stocks claims that the State failed to properly prove the prior conviction. This court disagrees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and therefore affirm. ¶2 Olson purchased a home from Bauer. Her complaint, filed in July 2007, claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37722 - 2014-09-15
, and therefore affirm. ¶2 Olson purchased a home from Bauer. Her complaint, filed in July 2007, claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37722 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not disputed. The incident giving rise to the claim occurred in March 2009. The one-year Erie policy period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74613 - 2014-09-15
are not disputed. The incident giving rise to the claim occurred in March 2009. The one-year Erie policy period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74613 - 2014-09-15
Richard P. Cline v. Kristine H. Zynda
433, 443-44, 287 N.W.2d 140, 145 (1980) (no issue or claimed error of the trial court may be reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14397 - 2005-03-31
433, 443-44, 287 N.W.2d 140, 145 (1980) (no issue or claimed error of the trial court may be reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14397 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Nuchell
the defendant ... a valuable lesson.” Nuchell claims that there is no pattern of escalating conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14000 - 2005-03-31
the defendant ... a valuable lesson.” Nuchell claims that there is no pattern of escalating conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14000 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (citation omitted). As we did in Hatch, we will address the claimed error in this case. ¶8 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2008-12-29
) (citation omitted). As we did in Hatch, we will address the claimed error in this case. ¶8 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2008-12-29