Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49051 - 49060 of 56214 for n y c.
Search results 49051 - 49060 of 56214 for n y c.
[PDF]
State v. Darryl A. Harding
under the seat and he replied, “[N]othing.” Engelking then requested the passenger to place his hands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
under the seat and he replied, “[N]othing.” Engelking then requested the passenger to place his hands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” Id. (citations omitted). Thus, while “[a]n officer may conduct a traffic stop when he or she has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46660 - 2014-09-15
.” Id. (citations omitted). Thus, while “[a]n officer may conduct a traffic stop when he or she has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46660 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
within the meaning of “retirement home for the aged[.]” See, e.g., State v. Lickes, 2021 WI 60, ¶33 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19
within the meaning of “retirement home for the aged[.]” See, e.g., State v. Lickes, 2021 WI 60, ¶33 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815731 - 2024-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
handwritten notation explaining that Lagrone was giving up his right to testify for “phase I,” but “[n]ot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139119 - 2017-09-21
handwritten notation explaining that Lagrone was giving up his right to testify for “phase I,” but “[n]ot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139119 - 2017-09-21
County of Milwaukee v. Jesse B. Eagle
suspicion. Id. at 453‑54 n.6. This “analysis” has subsequently been limited to the facts of that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7645 - 2005-03-31
suspicion. Id. at 453‑54 n.6. This “analysis” has subsequently been limited to the facts of that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[a]n by stating the obvious—criminal charges were not ‘com- menced’ against Faber for his November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134124 - 2017-09-21
[a]n by stating the obvious—criminal charges were not ‘com- menced’ against Faber for his November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy R. Cooke
consistency.” Id. at ¶22. The Magnuson court adopted a bright-line test: “[A]n offender’s status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16205 - 2017-09-21
consistency.” Id. at ¶22. The Magnuson court adopted a bright-line test: “[A]n offender’s status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16205 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
-07 n.1, 539 N.W.2d 723, 725 (Ct. App. 1995) (appellate review of suppression orders may include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19
-07 n.1, 539 N.W.2d 723, 725 (Ct. App. 1995) (appellate review of suppression orders may include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kevin S. Schatzke
interrogation even if he has been advised of his rights. … [A]n accused, … having expressed his desire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4811 - 2017-09-20
interrogation even if he has been advised of his rights. … [A]n accused, … having expressed his desire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4811 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Terens
, ¶29 n.4, 236 Wis. 2d 686, 613 N.W.2d 629. The same evidence may fall into more than one exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19149 - 2017-09-21
, ¶29 n.4, 236 Wis. 2d 686, 613 N.W.2d 629. The same evidence may fall into more than one exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19149 - 2017-09-21