Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 15281 for 2013.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 15281 for 2013.
CA Blank Order
District II February 13, 2013 To: Hon. Paul V. Malloy Circuit Court Judge Ozaukee County Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92733 - 2013-02-12
District II February 13, 2013 To: Hon. Paul V. Malloy Circuit Court Judge Ozaukee County Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92733 - 2013-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. This matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175468 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm. This matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175468 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174491 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 see also Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174491 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2013-14).[1] In light of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Houghton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
809.21 (2013-14).[1] In light of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Houghton
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145079 - 2015-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
the same methodology as the circuit court. Stoker v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2013 WI App 144, ¶11, 352 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113113 - 2014-05-27
the same methodology as the circuit court. Stoker v. Milwaukee Cnty., 2013 WI App 144, ¶11, 352 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113113 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no- merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141571 - 2017-09-21
a no- merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141571 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97639 - 2013-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97639 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 940.47 (2013-14). 2 ¶3 Following a consolidated trial, Thames was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157115 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 940.47 (2013-14). 2 ¶3 Following a consolidated trial, Thames was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157115 - 2017-09-21