Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Blasing had implied that Blasing was in custody. The court denied the motion, noting that Blasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
Blasing had implied that Blasing was in custody. The court denied the motion, noting that Blasing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Blasing had implied that Blasing was in custody. The court denied the motion, noting that Blasing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
Blasing had implied that Blasing was in custody. The court denied the motion, noting that Blasing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. ¶3 The court denied the motion because, it found, Pitts was no longer in the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51622 - 2010-07-06
was ineffective. ¶3 The court denied the motion because, it found, Pitts was no longer in the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51622 - 2010-07-06
State v. Peter Ennis
in custody. However, the trial court refused to give Ennis sentence credit for the times he was in DIS from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11156 - 2005-03-31
in custody. However, the trial court refused to give Ennis sentence credit for the times he was in DIS from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was ineffective. ¶3 The court denied the motion because, it found, Pitts was no longer in the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51622 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective. ¶3 The court denied the motion because, it found, Pitts was no longer in the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Peter Ennis
to reflect 486 days of sentence credit for the time Ennis spent in custody. However, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11156 - 2017-09-19
to reflect 486 days of sentence credit for the time Ennis spent in custody. However, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11156 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion sought credit for the same 407 days of presentence custody as he sought in his three prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674522 - 2023-07-06
motion sought credit for the same 407 days of presentence custody as he sought in his three prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674522 - 2023-07-06
CA Blank Order
court erred in denying Williams’ suppression motion. It does not appear that this issue is directly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2014-01-22
court erred in denying Williams’ suppression motion. It does not appear that this issue is directly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2014-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75291 - 2014-09-15
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75291 - 2014-09-15
Scott R. Wilke v. Judith A. Wilke
] The trial court denied the motion, concluding that because the Marital Settlement Agreement included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10554 - 2005-03-31
] The trial court denied the motion, concluding that because the Marital Settlement Agreement included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10554 - 2005-03-31