Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 30108 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Travis J. Derks
we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5355 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
there are sufficient facts to allow the issuing of an instruction is a question of law [that] we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102703 - 2013-10-07

State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Draughon, 2005 WI App 162, ¶9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806594 - 2024-05-29

CA Blank Order
the interpretation and application of statutes to the facts; our review is de novo. See State v. Keyes, 2008 WI 54
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-04-15

[PDF] State v. Lawrence J. Van Boxtel
a probable cause determination de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16006 - 2017-09-21

State v. Leopoldo Pequeno
courts review de novo. And he also properly cites Weiss v. Regent Properties, Ltd., 118 Wis. 2d 225, 229
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6142 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Whether the writ is an available remedy is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Maus does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. (Footnote omitted.) ¶3 Kreger-Mueller sought a de novo trial in the circuit court, and, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172919 - 2017-09-21

County of Waukesha v. Gene W. Squire
this standard is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 54. ¶6 We conclude that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3549 - 2005-03-31