Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 63536 for records.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion’s appendix was previously made part of the Record, but the State assumes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98665 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion’s appendix was previously made part of the Record, but the State assumes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98665 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of fact or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32359 - 2008-04-07
a question of fact or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32359 - 2008-04-07
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Robert G. Riegelman
and complaint were filed and served, the alleged attorney of record who was licensed in Wisconsin (Weinstine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16411 - 2005-03-31
and complaint were filed and served, the alleged attorney of record who was licensed in Wisconsin (Weinstine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
There is some confusion in the record over the use of the term “postconviction counsel.” Branch filed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32359 - 2014-09-15
There is some confusion in the record over the use of the term “postconviction counsel.” Branch filed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32359 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was played; however, the video itself is not in the appellate record. No. 2015AP1400-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
was played; however, the video itself is not in the appellate record. No. 2015AP1400-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
representation “unless it is totally unsupported by facts in the record.” Id., ¶29. B. September 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192798 - 2017-09-21
representation “unless it is totally unsupported by facts in the record.” Id., ¶29. B. September 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial record containing his original bond conditions was in the court of appeals. Thus, Combs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30405 - 2014-09-15
the trial record containing his original bond conditions was in the court of appeals. Thus, Combs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30405 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Consistent with the record and the parties’ briefing in this court, we use the term “C- store” to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
Consistent with the record and the parties’ briefing in this court, we use the term “C- store” to refer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
State v. William E. Spaeth
penalties prescribed for fifth-time OAR offenders. Because we conclude that the record does not adequately
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17032 - 2005-03-31
penalties prescribed for fifth-time OAR offenders. Because we conclude that the record does not adequately
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chue Moua
that this was the date on her “shot records” and this had been the date on her green card but she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11684 - 2017-09-19
that this was the date on her “shot records” and this had been the date on her green card but she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11684 - 2017-09-19