Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 83741 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 4911 - 4920 of 83741 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
were entitled to detain King "while a proper search [was] conducted." 452 U.S. at 705. In King's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
were entitled to detain King "while a proper search [was] conducted." 452 U.S. at 705. In King's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10730 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
were entitled to detain King "while a proper search [was] conducted." 452 U.S. at 705. In King's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10729 - 2005-03-31
were entitled to detain King "while a proper search [was] conducted." 452 U.S. at 705. In King's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10729 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
that the cases addressing dog sniffs in other circumstances established that dog sniffs were not searches
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
that the cases addressing dog sniffs in other circumstances established that dog sniffs were not searches
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. 2d 206. In that case a court commissioner issued a no-knock search warrant based on an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 206. In that case a court commissioner issued a no-knock search warrant based on an affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lance R. Ward
judgment in weighing the sufficiency of search warrant applications in marginal cases, the State asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
judgment in weighing the sufficiency of search warrant applications in marginal cases, the State asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, repeated sexual assault of the same child and incest. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15
, repeated sexual assault of the same child and incest. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15
State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
is inapplicable to this case because, unlike the defendants in Bryant, he was not given any additional information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11064 - 2005-03-31
is inapplicable to this case because, unlike the defendants in Bryant, he was not given any additional information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11064 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury convicted Guthman of all three counts. He moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58854 - 2011-01-18
. The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury convicted Guthman of all three counts. He moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58854 - 2011-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 had made a prima facie case that his plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15
3 had made a prima facie case that his plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82459 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
that the supreme court’s ruling in Bryant is inapplicable to this case because, unlike the defendants in Bryant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11064 - 2017-09-19
that the supreme court’s ruling in Bryant is inapplicable to this case because, unlike the defendants in Bryant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11064 - 2017-09-19