Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49111 - 49120 of 59029 for do.

[PDF] Shellie K. T. v. Brett P. C.
contradictions in the stipulation do not compel a finding that counsel was ineffective. The stipulation also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25205 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, we do not address the Kaczors’ alternative argument that they are entitled to a prescriptive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865423 - 2024-10-22

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
(appellate courts “‘do not step out of our neutral role to develop or construct arguments for parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792288 - 2024-04-24

COURT OF APPEALS
do think in terms of the victim impact issue she does have some standing here today; and I would ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to file a reply brief despite our having granted his March 2025 request for an extension to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26

[PDF] State v. Randy J. Graham
§ 943.20(3)(d)2 was created. We do not agree that Graham’s “taking” of the purse was limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15789 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
to a jury trial and, even if it did not, the court erroneously exercised its discretion by doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50469 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
chosen to do so. IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215514 - 2018-07-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the State proved Thiry’s qualifying prior conviction beyond a reasonable doubt, we do not agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=543063 - 2022-07-13

[PDF] State v. Dallas D. Lucas
. 2d 662, 648 N.W.2d 41]; the near-maximum consecutive sentences do not represent the minimum amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7105 - 2017-09-20