Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49121 - 49130 of 82499 for simple case.
Search results 49121 - 49130 of 82499 for simple case.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the following reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the following reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf
in damages. We reject this argument. The facts of this case are distinguishable from Kull. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
in damages. We reject this argument. The facts of this case are distinguishable from Kull. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Czarnecki
3 Several of the documents filed in this case list Czarnecki as receiving sentences of different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16247 - 2017-09-21
3 Several of the documents filed in this case list Czarnecki as receiving sentences of different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16247 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
to represent him. Higginbotham’s responses were varied. He repeatedly indicated that he wanted the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s representation of Murray, assistant district attorney Patti Wabitsch was assigned to the case. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97639 - 2013-06-04
counsel’s representation of Murray, assistant district attorney Patti Wabitsch was assigned to the case. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97639 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
Michael Leban v. Sun Patio, Inc.
before submitting the case to the jury because Leban had waited an unreasonable amount of time before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12463 - 2017-09-21
before submitting the case to the jury because Leban had waited an unreasonable amount of time before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12463 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987114 - 2025-07-23
of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987114 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789574 - 2024-04-17
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789574 - 2024-04-17
Jayson D. Edwards v. Gary R. McCaughtry
minimum will vary from case to case depending on the severity of the charges and the complexity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3797 - 2005-03-31
minimum will vary from case to case depending on the severity of the charges and the complexity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3797 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
and affirm. ¶2 The facts necessary to resolve this case are brief. On February 17, 2005, at about 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28030 - 2007-02-06
and affirm. ¶2 The facts necessary to resolve this case are brief. On February 17, 2005, at about 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28030 - 2007-02-06