Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49141 - 49150 of 57651 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
upon facts of record. Id., ¶13. Accordingly, we remanded the matter for further findings. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107544 - 2014-01-29

CA Blank Order
will uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶10. In his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15

State v. John R. Martin
). The defendant bears the burden of showing, from the record, that a sentence is unreasonable. Id. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11311 - 2005-03-31

State v. John R. Martin
). The defendant bears the burden of showing, from the record, that a sentence is unreasonable. Id. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11308 - 2005-03-31

State v. John R. Martin
). The defendant bears the burden of showing, from the record, that a sentence is unreasonable. Id. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11306 - 2005-03-31

Wendell Klein v. Town of Trempealeau
flooding. See id. The legislature sought to protect municipal governments from repetitive lawsuits making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14440 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. ¶6 The Escalona-Naranjo rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to each factor is committed to the court’s discretion. Id. Our review of the record confirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039480 - 2025-11-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
No. 2019AP483-CRNM 4 discretion, see id., ¶17, or that the sentence was excessive, see Ocanas v. State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252715 - 2020-01-21

State v. Roger A. Brainard
probability that the person would commit future sexually violent offenses] beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7352 - 2005-03-31