Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49171 - 49180 of 83392 for simple case search.
Search results 49171 - 49180 of 83392 for simple case search.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2019-20).1 We summarily affirm. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2015CF4454
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
809.21 (2019-20).1 We summarily affirm. In Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2015CF4454
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=444660 - 2021-10-26
Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion to decline jurisdiction in this case because Richard was concurrently seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher J. Burt
case. Christopher J. Burt appeals from an amended judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25690 - 2006-06-27
case. Christopher J. Burt appeals from an amended judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25690 - 2006-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
that brought this case into court. ¶4 Determining that it would be more convenient to have Electromania
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
that brought this case into court. ¶4 Determining that it would be more convenient to have Electromania
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
08AP392 State v. Thomas R. Beninghaus.doc
independently of the circuit court. Smith, 746 N.W.2d 243, ¶55. We examine the case law interpreting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12
independently of the circuit court. Smith, 746 N.W.2d 243, ¶55. We examine the case law interpreting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33706 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
the default. Although present at the disposition phase, she did not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57488 - 2014-09-15
the default. Although present at the disposition phase, she did not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57488 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case and reaches a reasonable result. Keller, 256 Wis. 2d 401, ¶6. In general, we look for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100977 - 2013-08-20
of the case and reaches a reasonable result. Keller, 256 Wis. 2d 401, ¶6. In general, we look for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100977 - 2013-08-20
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Warren L. Brandt
2003 WI 138 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1525-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16633 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI 138 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-1525-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s order. ¶2 We begin by noting that the only source of the underlying facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64172 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s order. ¶2 We begin by noting that the only source of the underlying facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64172 - 2014-09-15