Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4921 - 4930 of 30007 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
“On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452122 - 2021-11-16

[PDF] Marshfield Clinic v. Tennes A. Tulpan
judgment de novo, applying the same method as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7556 - 2017-09-19

Howard Cable Lock Tv v. Great Lakes Construction
interpretation is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Anderson, 178 Wis.2d 103, 107, 503
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8793 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary McCaughtry
. 1998). Since we apply the substantial evidence test de novo in this appeal, Dillard has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13394 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Stansfield Vending, Inc. v. Osseo Truck Travel Plaza, LLC
are undisputed, “only legal issues remain and our review is de novo.” Kernz v. J.L. French Corp., No. 02-1292
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6401 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. However, whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47800 - 2010-03-10

David J. Geisler v. Marc S. Baldwin
of law that we review de novo. See Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Owen, 191 Wis. 2d 744, 747, 530 N.W.2d 51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5618 - 2005-03-31

Margricio Benitez v. William Fasick
these issues de novo. First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13362 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
’ arguments, the court suggested this was a “de facto summary judgment situation” and asked whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12