Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4921 - 4930 of 76666 for search which.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“WILDFR,” which matched the information from the dispatch. No. 2015AP332 3 ¶5 The deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
sent the officer five images of prepubescent children, at least two of which were sexually explicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132122 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
children. Babcock sent the officer five images of prepubescent children, at least two of which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132122 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For the public - Lawyer regulation system
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/services/public/lawyerreg/index.htm - 2026-01-09

State v. Scott G. Waddell
the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. See Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d at 137. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16165 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott G. Waddell
, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of safely driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16165 - 2017-09-21

State v. William S. Cherry
buy, police obtained a search warrant for the apartment where the buy occurred, apartment 804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4390 - 2005-03-31

State v. William S. Cherry
buy, police obtained a search warrant for the apartment where the buy occurred, apartment 804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4389 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brian A. Patterson
was conducting a “drug investigation” in which he intended to perform a “knock and talk,” and a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5216 - 2017-09-19

State v. Brian A. Patterson
that, on appeal, the State, which has offered no response to Patterson’s plain-error argument, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31