Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4921 - 4930 of 20941 for word.

State v. Jorel T. Norwood
, in Norwood’s words, “flew out of [his] mouth” the second time. Finally, although Norwood argues that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07

[PDF] Office of State Public Defender v. Circuit Court For Walworth County
the word “person” with “child.” See 1999 Wis. Act 9, § 1130x. This section first applied to CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15795 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Thomas Richmond v. William Puckett
original [PSI]. In other words, [Richmond] attributed his behavior to drinking and drugs, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11635 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Willmer Guillaume v. Larry Elvetici
applied the lower burden of proof, or in Guillaume’s words, the preponderance of the evidence burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7308 - 2017-09-20

State v. Antonio Herrera, Jr.
gratuitous information about him, but was, in Herrera’s own words, intrinsically part of the criminal episode
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3644 - 2005-03-31

State v. Annette L. Memmer
of the same acts that violated her probation. In other words, she is arguing that she has been punished twice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3013 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Paul B. Rubenalt v. Dale E. Reeve
of confidence that the same nuisance issue was tried in municipal court, because of the ambiguous wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14518 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Angela Van Ess v. Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System
a restatement of the "independent proprietary functions and powers" standard. In other words, state agencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8120 - 2017-09-19

Ryan A. v. Wright C. Laufenberg
, an agency or person authorized to file a petition under 48.25 or 48.835." The word "parent" is subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9407 - 2005-03-31

Thomas P. Reitz v. Acres of America, Inc.
place. In other words, while the plaintiffs now own two more lots than they originally expected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8691 - 2005-03-31