Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
State v. Roderick Bankston
double jeopardy rights.” Id. In the instant case, however, Bankston did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12741 - 2005-03-31
double jeopardy rights.” Id. In the instant case, however, Bankston did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then proceeded to a contested hearing, during which Taylor, Elizabeth Lamoreaux (Max’s case manager), and Max
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
then proceeded to a contested hearing, during which Taylor, Elizabeth Lamoreaux (Max’s case manager), and Max
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001570 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Norman C. Danielson v. City of Sun Prairie
2000 WI App 227 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2719
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16121 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 227 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2719
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16121 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Windsor v. Village of DeForest
2003 WI App 114 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4898 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 114 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4898 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that version of the statute does not apply in this case. We direct the entry of an amended judgment. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
that version of the statute does not apply in this case. We direct the entry of an amended judgment. We do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to prison. At that same time, his probation in the 1992 case was revoked and he was sentenced to ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192128 - 2017-09-21
to prison. At that same time, his probation in the 1992 case was revoked and he was sentenced to ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192128 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, citing only one inapposite case and providing no further analysis. See Muller v. State, 94 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
, citing only one inapposite case and providing no further analysis. See Muller v. State, 94 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
Diane L. Finster v. James R. Finster
The facts of this case are extensive. We do not attempt their comprehensive recitation, but rather outline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5892 - 2005-03-31
The facts of this case are extensive. We do not attempt their comprehensive recitation, but rather outline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5892 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 256
2006 WI App 256 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP3087 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27196 - 2006-12-19
2006 WI App 256 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP3087 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27196 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel W. Nipple
case, No. 98-1615-CR 10 viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct.” Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14109 - 2014-09-15
case, No. 98-1615-CR 10 viewed as of the time of counsel’s conduct.” Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14109 - 2014-09-15