Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 82499 for simple case.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 82499 for simple case.
State v. Kelly J. Kloss
the defendant. ¶8 The balance of Kloss’s motion recited relevant case law establishing a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31
the defendant. ¶8 The balance of Kloss’s motion recited relevant case law establishing a defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15248 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Ketner
of the trial court, and (3) although § 346.63(1)(c), as interpreted by case law, requires dismissal of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10077 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court, and (3) although § 346.63(1)(c), as interpreted by case law, requires dismissal of one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10077 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
2009 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP917-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
2009 WI 94 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP917-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40890 - 2009-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
by the plea agreement, nor did it otherwise inquire if Paznonski understood that to be the case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30166 - 2007-09-04
by the plea agreement, nor did it otherwise inquire if Paznonski understood that to be the case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30166 - 2007-09-04
State v. Andrew C. Polhamus
, this case is distinguishable from Jones. In both Jones and this case, a very short time elapsed between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14196 - 2005-03-31
, this case is distinguishable from Jones. In both Jones and this case, a very short time elapsed between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14196 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marshal G. Eske
the facts of the instant case, the “other term of incarceration” is Eske’s ninety-day sentence, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12048 - 2005-03-31
the facts of the instant case, the “other term of incarceration” is Eske’s ninety-day sentence, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12048 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s ruling that the State cannot introduce the statement in its case-in-chief, but reverse its ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2010-10-13
court’s ruling that the State cannot introduce the statement in its case-in-chief, but reverse its ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2010-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of an action. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247724 - 2019-10-01
of an action. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247724 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
State v. A. David McCormack
counsel would be prepared to try the case within a short time. The court could also have reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19
counsel would be prepared to try the case within a short time. The court could also have reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2017AP1205-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215062 - 2018-07-03
2017AP1205-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215062 - 2018-07-03