Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 83976 for simple case search.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 83976 for simple case search.
Brown County v. Heather M. A.
the petition. The court set the case for a fact-finding hearing. ¶3 Heather, her mother, and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6318 - 2005-03-31
the petition. The court set the case for a fact-finding hearing. ¶3 Heather, her mother, and her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6318 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Sales were dismissed from the case on October 23, 2007, pursuant to a stipulation with Tweet/Garot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
. Sales were dismissed from the case on October 23, 2007, pursuant to a stipulation with Tweet/Garot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bartelt’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589084 - 2022-11-16
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bartelt’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589084 - 2022-11-16
[MS WORD]
FA-4161VA: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment - without Minor Children
Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Enter the name of the county in which this case
/formdisplay/FA-4161VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4161VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Enter the name of the county in which this case
/formdisplay/FA-4161VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4161VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
[PDF]
Joseph Ermenc v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0531 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13665 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-0531 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661991 - 2023-05-31
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661991 - 2023-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and in particular the problematic process undertaken in this particular case.” The prosecution objected because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04
and in particular the problematic process undertaken in this particular case.” The prosecution objected because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
through the full colloquy required by the cases, and certainly made no attempt to give [him] an awareness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
through the full colloquy required by the cases, and certainly made no attempt to give [him] an awareness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the same circuit court judge. He suggested this was not fair because his case involved mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
the same circuit court judge. He suggested this was not fair because his case involved mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of disorderly conduct as a habitual criminal. The cases were consolidated and set for trial on November 1, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27319 - 2006-12-04
of disorderly conduct as a habitual criminal. The cases were consolidated and set for trial on November 1, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27319 - 2006-12-04