Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49241 - 49250 of 83392 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
of interest in the case.” First, as explained above, we discern no error in Perez’s first staff advocate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60366 - 2011-02-23

State v. Bradford J. May
of the law applicable to the particular case. See Farrell v. John Deere Co., 151 Wis.2d 45, 60, 443 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
converted. DISCUSSION ¶5 Restitution in criminal cases is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court did not specifically acknowledge that Osinski may have assisted law enforcement in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19

State v. Jamal Purifoy
on this recitation plus its own recollection of the facts of the case, which were still fresh in its mind because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31

Graebner Enterprises, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Wisconsin
several issues relating to insurance coverage and several issues arising out of the trial of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7820 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ricardo Glover
at about 2:00 p.m., approximately fifty-six hours after his arrest. ¶4 Eventually the case went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[] open” the cases until May 2010. Under the terms of the agreement, Jennifer agreed to plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65478 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Cindy Dykema v. Lorney J. Bendel
, and that the insurer is in an identical position in this case as the insurer in Frank v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8903 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. State v. Wanta, 224 Wis. 2d 679, 702-03, 592 N.W.2d 645 (Ct. App. 1999). The defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93595 - 2013-03-05