Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49271 - 49280 of 69024 for had.
Search results 49271 - 49280 of 69024 for had.
State v. Jerry M. Brandt
and Nicole had been adjudicated delinquent in the past does not undermine this court’s confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
and Nicole had been adjudicated delinquent in the past does not undermine this court’s confidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Kevin Harvey
that Harvey had sales income of over $44,000 that he returned to the corporation. In 2001, he returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6355 - 2005-03-31
that Harvey had sales income of over $44,000 that he returned to the corporation. In 2001, he returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had a security deposit of $855 that was withheld; (2) deducting $110.32 for rent was a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
had a security deposit of $855 that was withheld; (2) deducting $110.32 for rent was a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
such a promise—that the judge had made up his [or her] mind about [Thomas’s] sentence before the [sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26
such a promise—that the judge had made up his [or her] mind about [Thomas’s] sentence before the [sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
mail privileges with Garrett because she had mailed Garrett a fraudulent or altered document. On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
mail privileges with Garrett because she had mailed Garrett a fraudulent or altered document. On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, not this court. Orton argues that the court misperceived the number of times that Orton had terminated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149526 - 2017-09-21
, not this court. Orton argues that the court misperceived the number of times that Orton had terminated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149526 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1986), and that it had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985, 989, 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101791 - 2017-09-21
(1986), and that it had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985, 989, 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101791 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record shows Marinko was aware of the maximum sentence the court could impose. He had rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21
. The record shows Marinko was aware of the maximum sentence the court could impose. He had rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102924 - 2017-09-21