Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49271 - 49280 of 82469 for simple case.
Search results 49271 - 49280 of 82469 for simple case.
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127892 - 2014-11-09
State v. Angela Jean Gustum
of burglary from other circuit court cases would be dismissed and read in. Consistent with the recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19859 - 2005-10-10
of burglary from other circuit court cases would be dismissed and read in. Consistent with the recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19859 - 2005-10-10
State v. Shalamar Bursinger
above and entered a not guilty plea. The case was presented to a jury. ¶7 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
above and entered a not guilty plea. The case was presented to a jury. ¶7 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Darnell Stevens
discretion. Attorney Matthew Huppertz was the fourth lawyer appointed to represent Stevens.1 The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8502 - 2017-09-19
discretion. Attorney Matthew Huppertz was the fourth lawyer appointed to represent Stevens.1 The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8502 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in the underlying CHIPS case. The no-merit report contains a correct statement of the law governing these issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91118 - 2014-09-15
in the underlying CHIPS case. The no-merit report contains a correct statement of the law governing these issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91118 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion when it imposed a near maximum sentence in this case.” The postconviction court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
discretion when it imposed a near maximum sentence in this case.” The postconviction court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the following reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the following reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf
in damages. We reject this argument. The facts of this case are distinguishable from Kull. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
in damages. We reject this argument. The facts of this case are distinguishable from Kull. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marshall Jones
the description of Jones. In such a case, it is the job of the trial court to resolve the ambiguity by making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05
the description of Jones. In such a case, it is the job of the trial court to resolve the ambiguity by making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26365 - 2006-09-05
State v. Jedd T.M.
, appeals from a dispositional order entered by the La Crosse County Circuit Court in three cases, 92-JV-223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9843 - 2005-03-31
, appeals from a dispositional order entered by the La Crosse County Circuit Court in three cases, 92-JV-223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9843 - 2005-03-31