Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49281 - 49290 of 82469 for simple case.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wabitsch was assigned to the case. ¶7 Trial counsel testified that she did not learn of the plea offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97639 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94659 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shawn Darnell Nunnery
in this case, to get me to give up these rights and plead Alford;” and the form indicates that Nunnery read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12433 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Charmaine B.
in extraordinary circumstances. “Moot cases will be decided on the merits only in the most exceptional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14355 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dawn K. Larson v. Russell T. Larson
. The trial court’s failure to conduct a colloquy in that case was but one of several circumstances causing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6277 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227434 - 2018-11-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1282 2 We previously ordered this appeal submitted for a determination of whether the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16

[PDF] Winnebago County DH&HS v. Lisa L.
parental rights is discretionary, in this case the court erroneously exercised its discretion because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24837 - 2017-09-21

WI App 135 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3036 Complete Title of ...
2011 WI App 135 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3036 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69581 - 2011-09-27

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s ruling that the State cannot introduce the statement in its case-in-chief, but reverse its ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55524 - 2010-10-13