Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49291 - 49300 of 59543 for do.
Search results 49291 - 49300 of 59543 for do.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and it actually damages your case.” The court continued: So what I’m going to ask that you do is that the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
and it actually damages your case.” The court continued: So what I’m going to ask that you do is that the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
as subsequent drug offenses, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.48. The guidelines do provide for penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
as subsequent drug offenses, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.48. The guidelines do provide for penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
without deciding that the officer’s testimony does not support a finding that the damage was “fresh,” I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
without deciding that the officer’s testimony does not support a finding that the damage was “fresh,” I do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102328 - 2013-09-25
CA Blank Order
allegations of probation violations. The rules of evidence do not apply at sentencing, and the court may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137101 - 2015-03-10
allegations of probation violations. The rules of evidence do not apply at sentencing, and the court may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137101 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
State v. David L.W.
laws to include offenses from other jurisdictions. 5 It did not do so here. The State would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12151 - 2017-09-21
laws to include offenses from other jurisdictions. 5 It did not do so here. The State would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that in their appellate briefs, the Smiths do not dispute Metzler’s assertion that § 813.125(2)(a) required them to mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04
that in their appellate briefs, the Smiths do not dispute Metzler’s assertion that § 813.125(2)(a) required them to mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033481 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
to file a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, it appears that Sanford could pursue at least one nonfrivolous argument. We emphasize that we do not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
, it appears that Sanford could pursue at least one nonfrivolous argument. We emphasize that we do not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
State v. Warren J. A.
). Among the evidential propositions which do not violate the propensity inference are plan, motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12935 - 2005-03-31
). Among the evidential propositions which do not violate the propensity inference are plan, motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
generally do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. See State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis. 2d 1, 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
generally do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. See State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis. 2d 1, 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21