Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49291 - 49300 of 64166 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
5 ¶11 Given the record in this case, we cannot say the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963506 - 2025-06-04

[PDF] NOTICE
After review of the record, we hold that the trial court did not err in concluding that the disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32828 - 2014-09-15

State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
and was made in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4325 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Henry T. Skibinski
was convicted of two or more prior convictions. Here, the record reflects that when Skibinski pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2591 - 2017-09-19

Marquette University v. Debbie A. Lapertosa
or unreasonable conduct. See Wis JI—Civil 3044. Our review of the record confirms that a contract was created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15513 - 2005-03-31

Waukesha County v. Dodge County
, but it made no findings of fact or determination of residency on the record. On March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14669 - 2005-03-31

Thomas M. Calaway v. Village of Allouez
consistent with its current use. There is nothing in the record which the Court can find which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3536 - 2005-03-31

WI App 77 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP3036 Complete Title of...
meetings, filed public record requests, and asked the board to review its decision. North Twin Builders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63469 - 2012-02-19

[PDF] State v. Derrick J.
standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7475 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
)). An appellate court “must examine the record to find facts that support upholding the [fact finder’s] decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103159 - 2013-10-22