Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49291 - 49300 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 49291 - 49300 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker testified in support of the default prove-up that LaDonna E. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
not testify. ¶4 The boy’s case worker testified in support of the default prove-up that LaDonna E. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
of the underlying facts in this case is the representations made by Schaefer’s counsel during the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
of the underlying facts in this case is the representations made by Schaefer’s counsel during the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of interest in the case.” First, as explained above, we discern no error in Perez’s first staff advocate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60366 - 2011-02-23
of interest in the case.” First, as explained above, we discern no error in Perez’s first staff advocate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60366 - 2011-02-23
State v. Bradford J. May
of the law applicable to the particular case. See Farrell v. John Deere Co., 151 Wis.2d 45, 60, 443 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31
of the law applicable to the particular case. See Farrell v. John Deere Co., 151 Wis.2d 45, 60, 443 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12390 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
converted. DISCUSSION ¶5 Restitution in criminal cases is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31
converted. DISCUSSION ¶5 Restitution in criminal cases is governed by Wis. Stat. § 973.20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court did not specifically acknowledge that Osinski may have assisted law enforcement in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
. The court did not specifically acknowledge that Osinski may have assisted law enforcement in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
State v. Jamal Purifoy
on this recitation plus its own recollection of the facts of the case, which were still fresh in its mind because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31
on this recitation plus its own recollection of the facts of the case, which were still fresh in its mind because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9077 - 2005-03-31
Graebner Enterprises, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Wisconsin
several issues relating to insurance coverage and several issues arising out of the trial of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7820 - 2005-03-31
several issues relating to insurance coverage and several issues arising out of the trial of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7820 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Glover
at about 2:00 p.m., approximately fifty-six hours after his arrest. ¶4 Eventually the case went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19
at about 2:00 p.m., approximately fifty-six hours after his arrest. ¶4 Eventually the case went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545910 - 2022-07-20