Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4931 - 4940 of 84253 for case number.

State of Wisconsin CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM Date: April 9, 2015 To: Clerk of Court of App...
of Appeals From: District 1 Opinions for Release On April 14, 2015 Opinion Case Number
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139609 - 2015-04-08

State of Wisconsin CORRESPONDENCE/MEMORANDUM Date: November 12, 2013 To: Clerk of Court of...
of Appeals From: District 4 Opinions for Release On November 14, 2013 Opinion Case Number
/ca/mitl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104354 - 2012-11-11

Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court opinions and rules
date Case number Keyword search Enter case numbers, a word or an exact phrase, to search the body
/opinions/sopinion.htm - 2026-02-15

[PDF] WI 16
Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date: 2022AP001728 Heather Gudex v
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951433 - 2025-05-22

[PDF] WI 16
Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date: 2022AP001728 Heather Gudex v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951433 - 2025-05-22

[MS WORD] GF-185: Certification by Prosecuting Agency Verifying Identity Theft or Mistaken Identity
the case number. I certify: The mere fact that a case is dismissed or a person is found
/formdisplay/GF-185.doc?formNumber=GF-185&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-02-04

COURT OF APPEALS
, Sherman and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J. At a plea hearing in this criminal case, defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69454 - 2011-08-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Vergeront, Sherman and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 BLANCHARD, J. At a plea hearing in this criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69454 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Rosalinda S.
. Because the record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6322 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rosalinda S.
sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and because this case was fully tried, this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6322 - 2005-03-31