Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49301 - 49310 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 49301 - 49310 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
explained on No. 2013AP486-CRNM 3 that form, and is not now claiming otherwise. See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117320 - 2017-09-21
explained on No. 2013AP486-CRNM 3 that form, and is not now claiming otherwise. See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117320 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Scott’s particularity challenge rests on his claim that the warrant’s description of the items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173683 - 2017-09-21
, Scott’s particularity challenge rests on his claim that the warrant’s description of the items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
before entry of the pleas, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Kraemer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225950 - 2018-11-07
before entry of the pleas, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Kraemer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225950 - 2018-11-07
[PDF]
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
was barred by the doctrine of laches from seeking reconciliation and making a claim for arrears against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18094 - 2017-09-21
was barred by the doctrine of laches from seeking reconciliation and making a claim for arrears against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18094 - 2017-09-21
County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
for a violation of a county shoreline ordinance. The County claims that it should be allowed to assess continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31
for a violation of a county shoreline ordinance. The County claims that it should be allowed to assess continuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Miller
exercised its discretion in denying him Huber law privileges. In fact, he claims that in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion in denying him Huber law privileges. In fact, he claims that in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald R. Wooden
postconviction relief. He claims the State failed to prove the repeater allegations against him. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13619 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief. He claims the State failed to prove the repeater allegations against him. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13619 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Mason’s plea was anything other than knowing, intelligent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Mason’s plea was anything other than knowing, intelligent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
an ongoing feud. Richardson, who claimed he was fearful for his safety and the safety of others in his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
an ongoing feud. Richardson, who claimed he was fearful for his safety and the safety of others in his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65050 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Grender argues that his postconviction counsel was ineffective by not alleging several claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170112 - 2017-09-21
. Grender argues that his postconviction counsel was ineffective by not alleging several claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170112 - 2017-09-21