Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49321 - 49330 of 75008 for judgment for us.

[PDF] Review-Memo
of Racine’s designation of alternate absentee voting sites and its use of a mobile voting van for in-person
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=845221 - 2024-08-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
incidents that formed the basis for the revocation proceeding now before us. The revocation materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87531 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 109
Judiciary, 73 Wis. 2d xxvii. "Judge" as used in the 1976 Rule "means a justice of the Supreme Court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206163 - 2017-12-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was negatively impacted by alcohol use. On August 2, 2018, the State filed a petition to terminate J.M.W.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289479 - 2020-09-22

[PDF] Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Swinson’s control based on the evidence that they were located in a desk used only by him. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4265 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
no-contest to the following: endangering safety by use of a dangerous weapon [count five], see Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21

[PDF] State v. Donald Savinski
. 980, STATS., which was used at his trial does not adequately state the law because: (1) the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11524 - 2017-09-19

Manitowoc County Department of Social Services v. Shannon T.
was voluntary and informed. With the record of the circuit court before us, we now consider Shannon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14321 - 2005-03-31

Manitowoc County Department of Social Services v. Shannon T.
was voluntary and informed. With the record of the circuit court before us, we now consider Shannon’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14320 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald Savinski
under ch. 980, Stats., which was used at his trial does not adequately state the law because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12522 - 2005-03-31