Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49351 - 49360 of 83433 for simple case search.

State v. Bridget P.
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6961 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion exists when, under the totality of the circumstances, the facts of the case would warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109478 - 2014-03-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165724 - 2017-09-21

John Hinz v. Christopher Leet
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8408 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to refer to all involved parties in this case. 3 Zachary’s father is deceased. The parental rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994702 - 2025-08-12

[PDF] James T. Carey, Jr. v. Ted Swiontek, Sr.
that their affidavits raise a genuine issue of material fact whether negotiations, as defined by the case law, occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11072 - 2017-09-19

State v. Charles Patterson
proceedings. ¶3 The trial court denied the motion and the case proceeded through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95628 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
instruction errors. We reject DeFlorian’s arguments and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94235 - 2014-09-15

State v. John E.
in this case; thus, the trial court was not required to exclude the evidence. ¶11 To show that John
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15853 - 2005-03-31