Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49361 - 49370 of 59051 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 49361 - 49370 of 59051 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Jimmy Williams
in postconviction proceedings concerned a claim of newly discovered evidence. That evidence consisted of a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3123 - 2005-03-31
in postconviction proceedings concerned a claim of newly discovered evidence. That evidence consisted of a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The standards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259149 - 2020-04-30
to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. The standards
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259149 - 2020-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a claim could not be sustained that the sentence “is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143100 - 2017-09-21
, a claim could not be sustained that the sentence “is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143100 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for the board to reach its decision. This argument underlies her claims that the board acted arbitrarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28592 - 2007-03-28
for the board to reach its decision. This argument underlies her claims that the board acted arbitrarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28592 - 2007-03-28
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court improperly exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100789 - 2013-08-13
that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the trial court improperly exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100789 - 2013-08-13
February 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21715 - 2006-03-07
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21715 - 2006-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sentence to its objectives. No. 2010AP189-CR 4 ¶7 We reject outright a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59990 - 2014-09-15
the sentence to its objectives. No. 2010AP189-CR 4 ¶7 We reject outright a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59990 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 5 The Nasmans’ claims of “fraudulent,” “felonious” or “bad faith” are vague and lack specificity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92377 - 2014-09-15
. 5 The Nasmans’ claims of “fraudulent,” “felonious” or “bad faith” are vague and lack specificity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92377 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a warrant. When Jenkins informed Yao he would be searching his person, Yao objected, claiming he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
a warrant. When Jenkins informed Yao he would be searching his person, Yao objected, claiming he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=940351 - 2025-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entry of the plea, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Kraemer, 156 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205685 - 2017-12-20
entry of the plea, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Kraemer, 156 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205685 - 2017-12-20