Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49381 - 49390 of 69007 for had.
Search results 49381 - 49390 of 69007 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court awarded Ludmyla her personal property, a vehicle Ernest had purchased, and half of the balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29759 - 2007-07-23
, the court awarded Ludmyla her personal property, a vehicle Ernest had purchased, and half of the balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29759 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
had a security deposit of $855 that was withheld; (2) deducting $110.32 for rent was a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
had a security deposit of $855 that was withheld; (2) deducting $110.32 for rent was a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this court that Marinez had failed to show that the evidence was testimonial. Marinez argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816263 - 2024-06-20
to this court that Marinez had failed to show that the evidence was testimonial. Marinez argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816263 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hold a final hearing. The motion noted L.M.W. had been transferred to another nursing home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218977 - 2018-09-11
hold a final hearing. The motion noted L.M.W. had been transferred to another nursing home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218977 - 2018-09-11
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
such a promise—that the judge had made up his [or her] mind about [Thomas’s] sentence before the [sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26
such a promise—that the judge had made up his [or her] mind about [Thomas’s] sentence before the [sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52437 - 2010-07-26
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
he was convicted after he had been sentenced. We disagree and affirm for the reasons explained below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
mail privileges with Garrett because she had mailed Garrett a fraudulent or altered document. On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
mail privileges with Garrett because she had mailed Garrett a fraudulent or altered document. On June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, not this court. Orton argues that the court misperceived the number of times that Orton had terminated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149526 - 2017-09-21
, not this court. Orton argues that the court misperceived the number of times that Orton had terminated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149526 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1986), and that it had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985, 989, 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101791 - 2017-09-21
(1986), and that it had a factual basis, State v. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985, 989, 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101791 - 2017-09-21