Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49391 - 49400 of 68410 for law.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and common law duties on circuit courts” to ensure that a defendant’s plea is validly given. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727944 - 2023-11-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not adequately prepare for trial. Appellate counsel discusses the proper law and appropriately analyzes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682395 - 2023-07-26

COURT OF APPEALS
the motion on its face. See id. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18

COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law for our independent review. See id. If, however: “the defendant fails to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101685 - 2013-09-09

General Casualty Insurance Company v. Feuling Concrete Construction, Inc.
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Just v. Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7860 - 2005-03-31

Spencer H. Lemenager v. Century Capital Group
. The existence of a duty presents an issue of law. Lisa's Style Shop v. Hagan Ins. Agency, 181 Wis.2d 565, 572
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7856 - 2005-03-31

Daniel J. Lenhart v. Robert L. Kisting
of law only if it is in conflict with established or conceded facts. See Haskins v. State, 97 Wis.2d 408
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy B. Sullivan
by trial counsel.’ A strategic decision rationally based on the facts and the law will not support a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5784 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Victoria L. Quaerna
of law that suspensions for demerit points assessed for convictions for Operating After Suspension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14495 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] General Casualty Insurance Company v. Feuling Concrete Construction, Inc.
and application of a contract, the question is solely one of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7860 - 2017-09-19