Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49391 - 49400 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 49391 - 49400 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Bales disputed A.E.B.’s claim that Olanzapine made him suicidal because he was unaware of any evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076411 - 2026-02-11
.” Bales disputed A.E.B.’s claim that Olanzapine made him suicidal because he was unaware of any evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076411 - 2026-02-11
CA Blank Order
of arguable merit for appeal. The report briefly addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
of arguable merit for appeal. The report briefly addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
, the record belies his claim. Magnuson’s probation officer set forth the recommendation in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13253 - 2005-03-31
, the record belies his claim. Magnuson’s probation officer set forth the recommendation in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13253 - 2005-03-31
James Wunrow v. Sheila Wunrow
are fairly considered. On remand, the trial court shall reconsider Sheila’s claim for limited-term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5100 - 2005-03-31
are fairly considered. On remand, the trial court shall reconsider Sheila’s claim for limited-term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5100 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] The jury also found in favor of Dr. Harvey on Zawatzke’s informed-consent claim. She does not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88620 - 2012-10-30
] The jury also found in favor of Dr. Harvey on Zawatzke’s informed-consent claim. She does not appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88620 - 2012-10-30
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel Edward Holman
to the court for a civil forfeiture violation of § 244-18 of the Milwaukee Code of Ordinances. Holman claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13034 - 2005-03-31
to the court for a civil forfeiture violation of § 244-18 of the Milwaukee Code of Ordinances. Holman claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13034 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and/or Clarification of the Judgment of Conviction,” claiming that the written judgment conflicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131740 - 2017-09-21
, and/or Clarification of the Judgment of Conviction,” claiming that the written judgment conflicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claim that his child support is too high is not based upon an argument that the circuit court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102230 - 2017-09-21
claim that his child support is too high is not based upon an argument that the circuit court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102230 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Loveday
of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. See § 941.23, STATS. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
of unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon. See § 941.23, STATS. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11407 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L.
a plausible claim that Christopher did not hear one of the questions correctly. These allegations, if true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7233 - 2017-09-20
a plausible claim that Christopher did not hear one of the questions correctly. These allegations, if true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7233 - 2017-09-20