Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4941 - 4950 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 4941 - 4950 of 69366 for as he.
State v. Larry Howard
for postconviction relief.[2] Howard argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14167 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief.[2] Howard argues that he is entitled to a new trial because he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14167 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth W. Grothmann
Metro Drug Unit, testified that on July 30, 2002, he was contacted by City of Muskego Police Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
Metro Drug Unit, testified that on July 30, 2002, he was contacted by City of Muskego Police Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of movable property, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(a). At trial, B.R. testified he first noticed four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182610 - 2017-09-21
of movable property, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(a). At trial, B.R. testified he first noticed four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182610 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and because he had a sufficient reason for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29110 - 2007-07-23
-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and because he had a sufficient reason for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29110 - 2007-07-23
State v. Kenneth Moffett
of sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15969 - 2005-03-31
of sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He argues that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15969 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it found he was not eligible for the Earned Release or Challenge Incarceration Programs, he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68247 - 2014-09-15
it found he was not eligible for the Earned Release or Challenge Incarceration Programs, he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68247 - 2014-09-15
Paul Piikkila v. Tim Loritz
PETERSON, J.[1] Paul Piikkila’s home was damaged by hail, and he contracted with Tim Loritz[2] to repair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6820 - 2005-03-31
PETERSON, J.[1] Paul Piikkila’s home was damaged by hail, and he contracted with Tim Loritz[2] to repair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6820 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Zamitalo
. After his motion to suppress was denied, Zamitalo pled guilty. He now renews his suppression argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31
. After his motion to suppress was denied, Zamitalo pled guilty. He now renews his suppression argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10818 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Zamitalo
to suppress was denied, Zamitalo pled guilty. He now renews his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
to suppress was denied, Zamitalo pled guilty. He now renews his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10818 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion when it found he was not eligible for the Earned Release or Challenge Incarceration Programs, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68247 - 2011-07-19
discretion when it found he was not eligible for the Earned Release or Challenge Incarceration Programs, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68247 - 2011-07-19