Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4941 - 4950 of 29928 for des.
Search results 4941 - 4950 of 29928 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of fact unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether these facts meet the “reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698543 - 2023-09-06
of fact unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether these facts meet the “reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698543 - 2023-09-06
Ira Banks v. State of Wisconsin Work Injury Supplement Benefit Fund
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 166. The law in this state is “‘well settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19153 - 2005-08-01
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 166. The law in this state is “‘well settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19153 - 2005-08-01
Nazir I. Al-Mujaahid v. City of Milwaukee
The issue is one of statutory construction—a question of law which we consider de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15038 - 2005-03-31
The issue is one of statutory construction—a question of law which we consider de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Chris J. Jacobs v. Gary R. McCaughtry
review of a prison disciplinary decision is de novo. See State ex rel. Anderson-el. v. Cooke, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6259 - 2017-09-19
review of a prison disciplinary decision is de novo. See State ex rel. Anderson-el. v. Cooke, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6259 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea colloquy was defective is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
the plea colloquy was defective is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Golackson argues here that the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092509 - 2026-03-19
of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation omitted). Golackson argues here that the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092509 - 2026-03-19
State v. Jacqueline J. Cole
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10542 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law which we review de novo. DOR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Tobey
the interpretation of a statute to a set of facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See K.N.K. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9220 - 2017-09-19
the interpretation of a statute to a set of facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See K.N.K. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Visnaw
that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new factor exists, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8501 - 2017-09-19
that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new factor exists, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8501 - 2017-09-19
Marshfield Clinic v. Tennes A. Tulpan
Blue Shield. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7556 - 2005-03-31
Blue Shield. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same method
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7556 - 2005-03-31