Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4941 - 4950 of 64825 for records.
Search results 4941 - 4950 of 64825 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
plea colloquy. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989591 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
provided ineffective assistance by failing to explore redacted portions of the victim’s medical records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54755 - 2014-09-15
provided ineffective assistance by failing to explore redacted portions of the victim’s medical records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54755 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2018AP2385-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2018AP2385-CR 2 conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316113 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey H. Bostedt
review of Tanya’s treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14822 - 2017-09-21
review of Tanya’s treatment records precluded him from discovering exculpatory evidence. Bostedt does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14822 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
reviewed the record. We conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues, and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94654 - 2013-03-26
reviewed the record. We conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues, and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94654 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
Janice Johnson Kuhn v. Charles V. James
and an expert witness, and (2) in granting summary judgment. Because the record offers no basis on which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10921 - 2017-09-20
and an expert witness, and (2) in granting summary judgment. Because the record offers no basis on which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10921 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
from the record and to order a new jury trial based on newly discovered evidence in the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
from the record and to order a new jury trial based on newly discovered evidence in the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52534 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, Treadway’s responses, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249521 - 2019-10-30
report, Treadway’s responses, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249521 - 2019-10-30
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
statutory scheme and form of judgment itself … make clear that the proceedings and record keeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
statutory scheme and form of judgment itself … make clear that the proceedings and record keeping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was a violation of his due process rights. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173397 - 2017-09-21
was a violation of his due process rights. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173397 - 2017-09-21

