Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49421 - 49430 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49421 - 49430 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a correct statement of Wisconsin law, we conclude the circuit court in the present case properly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682204 - 2023-07-26
is a correct statement of Wisconsin law, we conclude the circuit court in the present case properly applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682204 - 2023-07-26
State v. Bruce A. Halmstad
discretion in deciding whether to initiate prosecution in particular cases. See Sears v. State, 94 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7519 - 2005-03-31
discretion in deciding whether to initiate prosecution in particular cases. See Sears v. State, 94 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112246 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112246 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Susan Stauss v. Oconomowoc Residential Programs, Inc.
2000 WI App 269 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2481
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16016 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 269 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2481
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16016 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chad A. Achterberg
. We also conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in this case. Accordingly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16972 - 2005-03-31
. We also conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in this case. Accordingly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
5 Selzer, 2002 WI App 232, ¶10. In this case we are required to interpret WIS. STAT. § 632.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6943 - 2017-09-20
5 Selzer, 2002 WI App 232, ¶10. In this case we are required to interpret WIS. STAT. § 632.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6943 - 2017-09-20
Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
2002 WI App 156 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2567 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4413 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 156 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2567 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4413 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the case cited supervision as a factor relevant to the assessment of risk. Dahl argued that disallowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20
in the case cited supervision as a factor relevant to the assessment of risk. Dahl argued that disallowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52368 - 2010-07-20
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist Marc Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
PER CURIAM. This case arose on cross-motions for summary judgment after psychologist Marc Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32834 - 2008-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
move to dismiss and read in the remaining charges in this case as well as charges of attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235234 - 2019-02-15
move to dismiss and read in the remaining charges in this case as well as charges of attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235234 - 2019-02-15